|
|
Post by d5shark on Jan 11, 2020 22:02:27 GMT -8
Marleau with another gwg
|
|
|
|
Post by mk391419 on Jan 11, 2020 22:02:28 GMT -8
That was a good game.
|
|
|
|
Post by Marbles on Jan 11, 2020 22:05:47 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Jan 11, 2020 22:24:21 GMT -8
We have a new starting goalie.
|
|
|
|
Post by redbeard on Jan 11, 2020 23:57:38 GMT -8
Labanc is dogshit tonight Tonight?? |
|
|
|
Post by redbeard on Jan 12, 2020 0:01:31 GMT -8
Retarded lucky goal. Nice Both Sharks goals were fortunate. The only "slick" goal was the record high touch. That was quite a no goal... |
|
|
|
Post by redbeard on Jan 12, 2020 0:14:02 GMT -8
I didn't really focus much on him tonight. He did skate himself out of a tremendous scoring opportunity. He didn't annoy me as much as Labanc. I'm really beginning to hate that kid. The money players were generally absent from much high level play. This isbypart of the overall problem with this team. The "star" players don't show up all the time. They disappear for long stretches at times. In short, underachievers... And what is with EK65's aversion to making an easy play? There were tons of opportunities to make an easy play to the weak side and he continually tried to jam it into coverage. Puck movement as a whole needs to improve big time on this squad. |
|
|
|
Post by Marbles on Jan 12, 2020 7:07:32 GMT -8
We have a new starting goalie. Absolutely. Sure he will get beat a bit and is a smaller goalie. But he fucking battles and the team will feel confidence in that. |
|
|
|
Post by Marbles on Jan 12, 2020 7:10:20 GMT -8
Retarded lucky goal. Nice Both Sharks goals were fortunate. The only "slick" goal was the record high touch. That was quite a no goal... Patty's goal wasn't lucky. That's simply a solid PP goal when nothing has been clicking. Get hard shots on net and have guys nearby for rebounds. Burn's maybe, but when you have a roaming D man down low chaos will ensue and you can capitalize. I think this was a well earned team win. They did struggle at times entering the zone. But on the flip side they also had strong shifts from all forward lines and had a goalie that battled hard and kept the puck out when it mattered. Maybe LoCo as captain was at fault?  Really though I'm thinking these lines just work a bit better based on the personnel. We don't really have a clear line 1 but like 3 line 2s. |
|
|
|
Post by kaotao on Jan 12, 2020 7:11:49 GMT -8
Retarded lucky goal. Nice Both Sharks goals were fortunate. The only "slick" goal was the record high touch. That was quite a no goal... Lebanc might be attractive to other teams at the trade deadline considering his low cap hit. What kind of return could one expect? Could he fetch a first? |
|
|
|
Post by carolinasharksfan on Jan 12, 2020 11:04:06 GMT -8
Both Sharks goals were fortunate. The only "slick" goal was the record high touch. That was quite a no goal... Lebanc might be attractive to other teams at the trade deadline considering his low cap hit. What kind of return could one expect? Could he fetch a first? I can’t think of any team that would give a first round pick for Labanc. If DW was somehow able to pull that off, I’d take back all the bad things I’ve said about him this year. |
|
|
|
Post by redbeard on Jan 12, 2020 11:22:45 GMT -8
Both Sharks goals were fortunate. The only "slick" goal was the record high touch. That was quite a no goal... Patty's goal wasn't lucky. That's simply a solid PP goal when nothing has been clicking. Get hard shots on net and have guys nearby for rebounds. Burn's maybe, but when you have a roaming D man down low chaos will ensue and you can capitalize. I think this was a well earned team win. They did struggle at times entering the zone. But on the flip side they also had strong shifts from all forward lines and had a goalie that battled hard and kept the puck out when it mattered. Maybe LoCo as captain was at fault? Really though I'm thinking these lines just work a bit better based on the personnel. We don't really have a clear line 1 but like 3 line 2s. It's lucky when a rebound ends up right in your stick for the easiest of tap-ins. Nellie could've Potter that one!😝 |
|
|
|
Post by redbeard on Jan 12, 2020 11:27:45 GMT -8
Both Sharks goals were fortunate. The only "slick" goal was the record high touch. That was quite a no goal... Lebanc might be attractive to other teams at the trade deadline considering his low cap hit. What kind of return could one expect? Could he fetch a first? A first? No chance. The Sharks would be fortunate to get anything above a 5th. IMO a GM would have to be literally crazy to give anything valuable in trade for Labanc. Yes, the kid has his moments from time to time, but those times are few and far between. |
|
|
|
Post by jackalope on Jan 12, 2020 11:28:36 GMT -8
Both Sharks goals were fortunate. The only "slick" goal was the record high touch. That was quite a no goal... Patty's goal wasn't lucky. That's simply a solid PP goal when nothing has been clicking. Get hard shots on net and have guys nearby for rebounds. Burn's maybe, but when you have a roaming D man down low chaos will ensue and you can capitalize. I think this was a well earned team win. They did struggle at times entering the zone. But on the flip side they also had strong shifts from all forward lines and had a goalie that battled hard and kept the puck out when it mattered. Maybe LoCo as captain was at fault? Really though I'm thinking these lines just work a bit better based on the personnel. We don't really have a clear line 1 but like 3 line 2s. I agree... Burns goal was a lucky bounce but at the same time, had the pass ended up on his tape he would have dunked it. Dallas goal was unfortunate seeing the leagues #1 PK out there, but they are not going to be able to be 100% and sometimes a puck makes it though. I wish that line 1 and 2 could figure there stuff out to leave Goody on the 3rd with Jumbo and Sorensen. Another huge positive note... We actually won a fucking game by (1) goal. And didn't let anything in, in the 3rd period. |
|
|
|
Post by redbeard on Jan 12, 2020 11:28:38 GMT -8
Lebanc might be attractive to other teams at the trade deadline considering his low cap hit. What kind of return could one expect? Could he fetch a first? I can’t think of any team that would give a first round pick for Labanc. If DW was somehow able to pull that off, I’d take back all the bad things I’ve said about him this year. I wouldn't go that far!😝😝 |
|
|
|
Post by John96 on Jan 12, 2020 12:29:03 GMT -8
Lebanc might be attractive to other teams at the trade deadline considering his low cap hit. What kind of return could one expect? Could he fetch a first? A first? No chance. The Sharks would be fortunate to get anything above a 5th. IMO a GM would have to be literally crazy to give anything valuable in trade for Labanc. Yes, the kid has his moments from time to time, but those times are few and far between. Dislike Labanc as much as you want but his value is far higher than that and giving him up for a fifth would be asinine. |
|
|
|
Post by carolinasharksfan on Jan 12, 2020 12:51:36 GMT -8
A first? No chance. The Sharks would be fortunate to get anything above a 5th. IMO a GM would have to be literally crazy to give anything valuable in trade for Labanc. Yes, the kid has his moments from time to time, but those times are few and far between. Dislike Labanc as much as you want but his value is far higher than that and giving him up for a fifth would be asinine. Second or third? |
|
|
|
Post by redbeard on Jan 12, 2020 12:53:07 GMT -8
A first? No chance. The Sharks would be fortunate to get anything above a 5th. IMO a GM would have to be literally crazy to give anything valuable in trade for Labanc. Yes, the kid has his moments from time to time, but those times are few and far between. Dislike Labanc as much as you want but his value is far higher than that and giving him up for a fifth would be asinine. I'll be surprised if there's an offer for DW to even consider. If the Sharks get an offer above a 5th, I'd take it. He's on a one year deal, a cheap one at that, but his play doesn't warrant another deal. Certainly not one with a raise. There's still a lot of hockey left to play so he has the chance to step it up. Considering what's at stake, I'd assume he'll be stepping it up. I sure hope so... |
|
|
|
Post by Marbles on Jan 12, 2020 15:05:48 GMT -8
Patty's goal wasn't lucky. That's simply a solid PP goal when nothing has been clicking. Get hard shots on net and have guys nearby for rebounds. Burn's maybe, but when you have a roaming D man down low chaos will ensue and you can capitalize. I think this was a well earned team win. They did struggle at times entering the zone. But on the flip side they also had strong shifts from all forward lines and had a goalie that battled hard and kept the puck out when it mattered. Maybe LoCo as captain was at fault? Really though I'm thinking these lines just work a bit better based on the personnel. We don't really have a clear line 1 but like 3 line 2s. It's lucky when a rebound ends up right in your stick for the easiest of tap-ins. Nellie could've Potter that one!😝 Maybe there's some benefit in skating old fekkers! I don't see the young guys coming up with those goals. |
|
|
|
Post by Marbles on Jan 12, 2020 15:08:27 GMT -8
A first? No chance. The Sharks would be fortunate to get anything above a 5th. IMO a GM would have to be literally crazy to give anything valuable in trade for Labanc. Yes, the kid has his moments from time to time, but those times are few and far between. Dislike Labanc as much as you want but his value is far higher than that and giving him up for a fifth would be asinine. I honestly feel like he would fetch a second. Package him with dillon and I think you have a 1st and 2nd or 3rd. Only trouble is if you are banking on picks from a playoff contender you can get a fairly late slot and with Lobardi that is a crap shoot. |
|
|
|
Post by John96 on Jan 12, 2020 15:31:03 GMT -8
He’s too young and is already proven himself as a .5p/g player. That isn’t nothing. He has talent, that isn’t the issue. Sharks have never been good at developing skill. Even a guy like Hertl, who oozed talent at the outset transformed into a much more rounded player than a dynamic one. Not pinning this on the Sharks coaching either, kid has really taken a step back from learning to play as a pro.
Most contenders are looking for depth scoring, Labanc can bring that. Most rental options are pure rentals (no chance at resigning) and costly. Labanc is neither. He is certainly an asset that can be moved but I would think if you can get a second for him.
Put it this way, we all see GMs make really bad trades at the deadline. Out of anything DW has proven himself to be pretty good at swinging deals. If there’s a guy who’ll give up second round pick for a Ben Lovejoy I’m sure someone out there would do the same for Labanc.
|
|
|
|
Post by cjelli on Jan 12, 2020 16:05:29 GMT -8
He’s too young and is already proven himself as a .5p/g player. That isn’t nothing. He has talent, that isn’t the issue. Sharks have never been good at developing skill. Even a guy like Hertl, who oozed talent at the outset transformed into a much more rounded player than a dynamic one. Not pinning this on the Sharks coaching either, kid has really taken a step back from learning to play as a pro. Most contenders are looking for depth scoring, Labanc can bring that. Most rental options are pure rentals (no chance at resigning) and costly. Labanc is neither. He is certainly an asset that can be moved but I would think if you can get a second for him. Put it this way, we all see GMs make really bad trades at the deadline. Out of anything DW has proven himself to be pretty good at swinging deals. If there’s a guy who’ll give up second round pick for a Ben Lovejoy I’m sure someone out there would do the same for Labanc. Correct. The TD deals are wild, and here's the history of DW since I've been following him:
2012:
-2nd for Dominic Moore 2013:
+2ndx2 for Douglas Murray,
+4th for Michal Handzus +2,3 for Ryane Clowe -3 for Raffi Torres 2015:
+3rd for Tyler Kennedy +4th for James Sheppard 2016: there was a massive trade with the Leaves: +Reimer, Morin, Polak, Spaling -Torres(broken), Stalock, Smith, 2ndx2, 4th so more or less upgrade from Stalock to Reimer and Roman Polak were worth 2nd each. The Sharks went on to reach the SCF. 2017: -4th for (Hansen-Goldobin, i.e. 0-0=0) 2018: -7th for Fehr +6th for Grosenick+Bollig -1st, 4th for E. Kane 2019: -2nd, -3rd for Nyquist
A propos, there turned to be only two real winners among those: Bowman in 2013 and DW in 2016. All the rest either already proved not to be worth it, or on the way there.
|
|
