|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 19, 2021 11:52:17 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 19, 2021 12:25:52 GMT -8
I dont suppose you have heard this on CNN: From the WSJ Opinion section Here is information on the author, note the place of work: www.hopkinsmedicine.org/profiles/results/directory/profile/0018306/martin-makaryAmid the dire Covid warnings, one crucial fact has been largely ignored: Cases are down 77% over the past six weeks. If a medication slashed cases by 77%, we’d call it a miracle pill. Why is the number of cases plummeting much faster than experts predicted? In large part because natural immunity from prior infection is far more common than can be measured by testing. Testing has been capturing only from 10% to 25% of infections, depending on when during the pandemic someone got the virus. Applying a time-weighted case capture average of 1 in 6.5 to the cumulative 28 million confirmed cases would mean about 55% of Americans have natural immunity. Now add people getting vaccinated. As of this week, 15% of Americans have received the vaccine, and the figure is rising fast. Former Food and Drug Commissioner Scott Gottlieb estimates 250 million doses will have been delivered to some 150 million people by the end of March. There is reason to think the country is racing toward an extremely low level of infection. As more people have been infected, most of whom have mild or no symptoms, there are fewer Americans left to be infected. At the current trajectory, I expect Covid will be mostly gone by April, allowing Americans to resume normal life. Antibody studies almost certainly underestimate natural immunity. Antibody testing doesn’t capture antigen-specific T-cells, which develop “memory” once they are activated by the virus. Survivors of the 1918 Spanish flu were found in 2008—90 years later—to have memory cells still able to produce neutralizing antibodies. Researchers at Sweden’s Karolinska Institute found that the percentage of people mounting a T-cell response after mild or asymptomatic Covid-19 infection consistently exceeded the percentage with detectable antibodies. T-cell immunity was even present in people who were exposed to infected family members but never developed symptoms. A group of U.K. scientists in September pointed out that the medical community may be under-appreciating the prevalence of immunity from activated T-cells. Covid-19 deaths in the U.S. would also suggest much broader immunity than recognized. About 1 in 600 Americans has died of Covid-19, which translates to a population fatality rate of about 0.15%. The Covid-19 infection fatality rate is about 0.23%. These numbers indicate that roughly two-thirds of the U.S. population has had the infection. In my own conversations with medical experts, I have noticed that they too often dismiss natural immunity, arguing that we don’t have data. The data certainly doesn’t fit the classic randomized-controlled-trial model of the old-guard medical establishment. There’s no control group. But the observational data is compelling. I have argued for months that we could save more American lives if those with prior Covid-19 infection forgo vaccines until all vulnerable seniors get their first dose. Several studies demonstrate that natural immunity should protect those who had Covid-19 until more vaccines are available. Half my friends in the medical community told me: Good idea. The other half said there isn’t enough data on natural immunity, despite the fact that reinfections have occurred in less than 1% of people—and when they do occur, the cases are mild. But the consistent and rapid decline in daily cases since Jan. 8 can be explained only by natural immunity. Behavior didn’t suddenly improve over the holidays; Americans traveled more over Christmas than they had since March. Vaccines also don’t explain the steep decline in January. Vaccination rates were low and they take weeks to kick in. My prediction that Covid-19 will be mostly gone by April is based on laboratory data, mathematical data, published literature and conversations with experts. But it’s also based on direct observation of how hard testing has been to get, especially for the poor. If you live in a wealthy community where worried people are vigilant about getting tested, you might think that most infections are captured by testing. But if you have seen the many barriers to testing for low-income Americans, you might think that very few infections have been captured at testing centers. Keep in mind that most infections are asymptomatic, which still triggers natural immunity. Many experts, along with politicians and journalists, are afraid to talk about herd immunity. The term has political overtones because some suggested the U.S. simply let Covid rip to achieve herd immunity. That was a reckless idea. But herd immunity is the inevitable result of viral spread and vaccination. When the chain of virus transmission has been broken in multiple places, it’s harder for it to spread—and that includes the new strains. Herd immunity has been well-documented in the Brazilian city of Manaus, where researchers in the Lancet reported the prevalence of prior Covid-19 infection to be 76%, resulting in a significant slowing of the infection. Doctors are watching a new strain that threatens to evade prior immunity. But countries where new variants have emerged, such as the U.K., South Africa and Brazil, are also seeing significant declines in daily new cases. The risk of new variants mutating around the prior vaccinated or natural immunity should be a reminder that Covid-19 will persist for decades after the pandemic is over. It should also instill a sense of urgency to develop, authorize and administer a vaccine targeted to new variants. Some medical experts privately agreed with my prediction that there may be very little Covid-19 by April but suggested that I not to talk publicly about herd immunity because people might become complacent and fail to take precautions or might decline the vaccine. But scientists shouldn’t try to manipulate the public by hiding the truth. As we encourage everyone to get a vaccine, we also need to reopen schools and society to limit the damage of closures and prolonged isolation. Contingency planning for an open economy by April can deliver hope to those in despair and to those who have made large personal sacrifices. Dr. Makary is a professor at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and Bloomberg School of Public Health, chief medical adviser to Sesame Care, and author of “The Price We Pay.”
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 19, 2021 16:28:34 GMT -8
Pay attention loyal DNC females, tow the line as we see fit or this is you:
|
|
|
Post by cjelli on Feb 20, 2021 16:13:32 GMT -8
Members of a California school board resigned after they were caught mocking parents during a public video meeting about re-opening schools shuttered during the pandemic.
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 20, 2021 16:44:45 GMT -8
I love it when they are honest
Massachusetts Sen. Ed Markey said that "racial justice" should be the first priority in vaccinating Americans.
Many ripped the liberal senator’s tweet, saying that minimizing deaths should be the number one priority.
"Racial justice must be our number one priority as we distribute the COVID-19 vaccine," the Connecticut Democrat. "Join me live with @senwarren, @reppressley, @nikaelugardo, @macurry01, and Rev. Culpepper as we discuss the need for greater equity and accessibility in vaccinations."
"No, it must not," Fox News’ Guy Benson replied.
"Shouldn’t the priority be those most vulnerable to severe illness and even death from COVID?" Fox News’ Brit Hume wrote on Twitter.
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 23, 2021 10:49:20 GMT -8
Where is LeChuck?
EXCLUSIVE: Oberlin College is facing fresh criticism for continuing to give a platform to a so-called "professor of peace," Mohammad Jafar Mahallati, who as Iranian ambassador to the United Nations urged the elimination of the Jewish state.
A Fox News Digital investigation can reveal for the first time that Mahallati, a professor of Islamic Studies at the liberal arts college in Ohio, declared to the U.N. in 1988: "The adoption, by the General Assembly in 1947, of resolution 181 (II) on the partition of the land of Palestine and the establishment of the Zionist entity was itself in violation of provisions of the United Nations Charter, as well as of the rules of international law."
Mahallati's letters and speeches, reviewed by Fox News, covered the 1980s, particularly while he served as the Islamic Republic's envoy to the United Nations from 1987 to 1989. Mahallati denied the right of Israel to exist as a state, according to human rights and anti-Semitism experts.
At the U.N. in 1989, Mahallati defended the first Palestinian intifada — a series of violent protests and riots against the Jewish state — as "the heroic uprising of Palestinians."
Palestinians are setting an example for Arabs and Muslims across the world with respect to the "holy struggle against oppression and Zionism," Mahallati said at the U.N., also in 1989.
In his speeches, the academic appears to reference the entirety of Israel as Palestinian territory.
"Palestine is an Islamic territory, an Islamic heritage, and it remains an Islamic point of identity. The land of Palestine is the platform of the ascension of the Prophet Mohammad; its significance is that it contains the first kiblah direction−towards which Muslims prayed. Its occupation by Zionist usurpers is a transgression against all Muslims of the world and its liberation is therefore a great religious obligation and commitment," Mahallati said at the U.N. that same year.
"The Iranian regime engages in what I call an 'obsessive anti-Semitism,' and Iran's former ambassador to the UN is no exception," Ellie Cohanim, the U.S. State Department's former deputy special envoy to monitor and combat anti-Semitism, told Fox News. "The fact that Oberlin College would hire such a person, never mind give him tenure, is a stain on an institution that is meant to educate young Americans."
Cohanim, who fled the Islamic Republic as a young child due to widespread regime-sponsored anti-Semitism, added that Mahallati's "1989 statements at the UN glorify terrorism and what he calls 'martyrdom,' he denies the Jewish people the right to live in any part of their ancient homeland, and he attempts to revise history by calling Israel an "Islamic land," knowing very well that Judaism predated the rise of Islam by thousands of years and that Israel is the birthplace of the Jews.
"This man is no 'Professor of Peace.' He is in fact a professor of propaganda and Oberlin College holds a responsibility to fully investigate Mahallati's anti-Semitic statements and his knowledge of the 1988 Massacre in Iran," Cohanim said.
Mahallati has also faced questions from critics about what he knew about the 1988 executions of political prisoners. He has denied knowledge of or responsibility for the killings.
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 24, 2021 8:53:42 GMT -8
CHICKASHA, Okla. (AP) — An Oklahoma man who had been released early from prison in January as part of a mass commutation effort is now accused of three killings, including the death of a neighbor whose heart he cut out, authorities said. A judge denied bail Tuesday for Lawrence Paul Anderson, who faces three counts of first-degree murder, one count of assault and one count of maiming for the attack this month in Chickasha, about 35 miles (55 kilometers) southwest of Oklahoma City. According to the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation, Anderson is accused of killing Andrea Lynn Blankenship, 41, and cutting out her heart. Authorities say Anderson brought the heart to his aunt and uncle's house, cooked it with potatoes and tried to serve it to them before killing Leon Pye, 67, wounding the aunt and killing Kaeos Yates, the pair's 4-year-old granddaughter. Anderson sobbed in court during an initial court appearance Tuesday, The Oklahoman reported. “I don’t want no bail, your honor. I don’t want no bail,” he said. Anderson's attorney, Al Hoch, indicated that he will seek a mental evaluation to determine whether Anderson is competent to stand trial. Anderson had been sentenced in 2017 to 20 years in prison for probation violations on a drug case, the newspaper reported. Republican Gov. Kevin Stitt commuted the sentence last year to nine years in prison, and Anderson was released after serving a little more than three years. Grady County District Attorney Jason Hicks criticized the criminal justice reform that led to the commutations of hundreds of Oklahoma inmates. “It is time that we do better,” Hicks said. “If we have the highest incarceration rate in the world, OK. We can look at our citizens and be honest with them and tell them that you’re safe. I can’t tell the people in my district today that they’re safe.” Stitt's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday. Jason Nelson, Oklahoma's interim secretary for public safety, has said that the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board recommended commutation for Anderson on a 3-1 vote.
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 24, 2021 9:25:46 GMT -8
I am sure #metoo will be all over this:
A former aide to Gov. Andrew Cuomo is accusing the embattled New York leader of sexually harassing her -- including unwanted kissing and touching -- and says his top female staffers "normalized" the behavior.
Lindsey Boylan, the former deputy secretary for economic development and special adviser to the governor, said Cuomo constantly sought her out and had staffers arrange meetings with her, where he made inappropriate comments. "Let’s play strip poker," Boylan said Cuomo remarked on a flight from an event in October 2017, according to an essay she wrote on Medium published Wednesday.
In another encounter in December 2016, Boylan said Cuomo arranged through a handler to meet her in his Albany office, to which she agreed reluctantly. She said he gave her a tour of his office, "smirked" and showed off a cigar box he said was given to him by former President Bill Clinton while he served as the secretary of Housing and Urban Development.
Boylan said she interpreted that to be an innuendo referencing the affair between Clinton and his then-intern Monica Lewinsky in the mid-1990s.
She said she was warned by other staffers when she joined Cuomo's administration in 2015 to "be careful around the Governor."
Boylan said his behavior "was all so normalized — particularly by Melissa DeRosa and other top women around him — that only now do I realize how insidious his abuse was." She also alleged that shortly before the office incident, that made her feel uncomfortable, Stephanie Benton, director of the governor’s offices, told her in an email that Cuomo suggested she look up images of Lisa Shields — his rumored former girlfriend — because "we could be sisters" and told Boylan she was "the better looking sister."
"The Governor began calling me 'Lisa' in front of colleagues. It was degrading," Boylan wrote, including screenshots of the email exchange between her and Benton.
Boylan said in another incident, this time in Cuomo's New York City office, he kissed her on the lips.
"I was in shock, but I kept walking," Boylan wrote.
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 24, 2021 10:17:18 GMT -8
Ha Ha Ha:
BERKELEY, Calif. — In the most liberal city in one of the most liberal states in the country, parents are fuming at public sector unions over the delayed return to in-person classes at public schools.
“We’re all disillusioned, in Berkeley especially,” Lei Levi, a freelance advertising consultant and the mother of a first-grade student at Rosa Parks Elementary, told Yahoo News. “We’re very disillusioned by what seems to be a political machine that’s working against the most vulnerable and people who need public services.”
Levi is one of the lead organizers of BUSD Parents, a grassroots group that launched a campaign in November to pressure the city to reopen public schools that have been shuttered since early March of last year in response to the coronavirus pandemic. After organizing via email, the group grew to 500 members and held its first rally on Dec. 5 at a park in front of Berkeley’s Martin Luther King Jr. Middle School.
“It was really important for us that we tried to maintain a positive public spirit, that we are pro-public education and we see this as a public education crisis and we are not anti-teacher,” Levi said. “The problem is, that’s been a really hard narrative to fight against.”
Statewide, unions like the California Teachers Association hold tremendous political clout, in part because of the large donations they’ve made to help elect government officials. Parent activists like Levi said that when it comes to returning to classroom learning, that influence is hurting kids.
“I’m a progressive, but on this specific issue, we’ve seen how politics has been played in a way that California Democratic leaders seem to be aligned with union interests,” she said. “I’m a pro-union person, I’m a pro-worker person, but it seems when the CTA is one of the biggest donors to the California Democratic Party, this is a concern when they’re being obstructionist to getting back to the classroom.”
|
|
|
Post by cjelli on Feb 24, 2021 11:10:16 GMT -8
Ha Ha Ha: BERKELEY, Calif. — In the most liberal city in one of the most liberal states in the country, parents are fuming at public sector unions over the delayed return to in-person classes at public schools. “We’re all disillusioned, in Berkeley especially,” Lei Levi, a freelance advertising consultant and the mother of a first-grade student at Rosa Parks Elementary, told Yahoo News. “We’re very disillusioned by what seems to be a political machine that’s working against the most vulnerable and people who need public services.” Levi is one of the lead organizers of BUSD Parents, a grassroots group that launched a campaign in November to pressure the city to reopen public schools that have been shuttered since early March of last year in response to the coronavirus pandemic. After organizing via email, the group grew to 500 members and held its first rally on Dec. 5 at a park in front of Berkeley’s Martin Luther King Jr. Middle School. “It was really important for us that we tried to maintain a positive public spirit, that we are pro-public education and we see this as a public education crisis and we are not anti-teacher,” Levi said. “The problem is, that’s been a really hard narrative to fight against.” Statewide, unions like the California Teachers Association hold tremendous political clout, in part because of the large donations they’ve made to help elect government officials. Parent activists like Levi said that when it comes to returning to classroom learning, that influence is hurting kids. “I’m a progressive, but on this specific issue, we’ve seen how politics has been played in a way that California Democratic leaders seem to be aligned with union interests,” she said. “I’m a pro-union person, I’m a pro-worker person, but it seems when the CTA is one of the biggest donors to the California Democratic Party, this is a concern when they’re being obstructionist to getting back to the classroom.”The bees are getting suspicious (C)
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 24, 2021 11:25:46 GMT -8
Another reason to hate Amazon:
|
|
|
Post by carolinasharksfan on Feb 24, 2021 14:11:09 GMT -8
Another reason to hate Amazon: I assume they’ll be pulling books by Angela Davis, Malcolm X, Etc any day now. I canceled Amazon prime last year after their support for Burn Loot Murder. I’m sure they don’t care...but makes me feel better
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 24, 2021 18:02:54 GMT -8
The war on women:
The Biden administration has withdrawn from a Connecticut lawsuit that aims to ban transgender athletes from competing in girls’ high school sports.
A group of three female runners sued state and local education officials after losing state titles to transgender athletes in 2018. Backers of the lawsuit contend that athletes who were born male have a natural and unfair advantage over competitors who were born female.
Supporters of the transgender athletes in the case argue that once hormone therapies take effect, the male genetic advantage fades away – although those effects aren’t immediate, and many teens don’t begin taking such drugs until after puberty. "The gender identity doesn't matter, it's the testosterone levels," Joanna Harper, a medical physicist who is also a transgender runner herself, told the Associated Press in 2019. "Trans girls should have the right to compete in sports. But cisgender girls should have the right to compete and succeed, too. How do you balance that? That's the question."
The Department of Justice became involved in the case under former President Donald Trump, with former Attorney General Bill Barr filing a statement of interest in March 2020.
"The government has reconsidered the matter and hereby notifies the Court that it withdraws its Statement of Interest," the DOJ said, according to court documents filed Tuesday.
The Justice Department’s decision to back out of the case comes ahead of a Friday hearing on a motion to dismiss the lawsuit.
Connecticut is one of 17 states that allow transgender high school athletes to take part in sports without regulation. Some states place restrictions on transgender competitors, and others handle cases on an individual basis.
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 25, 2021 8:05:39 GMT -8
I am shocked the party to protect women has been so silent in the Cuomo sexual harassment accusation. "I believe all women"?
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, a longtime Cuomo ally, did not respond to Fox News' request for comment. Neither did House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
Democratic New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who last week joined GOP critics of Cuomo in calling for an investigation into the nursing home crisis, did not respond to a Fox News' requests for comment.
The National Organization for Women also kept mum.
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 25, 2021 8:26:15 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 25, 2021 8:30:25 GMT -8
No go zone:
The city of Berkeley, California, is implementing a series of sweeping police reforms in an effort to tackle racism in the criminal justice system.
On Tuesday night, the city council voted to end police traffic stops for low-level offenses, such as not wearing a seat belt or having an expired license. Police will also need written consent for vehicle searches, except under circumstances where consent is not legally required, and cops can no longer conduct warrantless searches of people on parole or probation. The city council also voted to fire officers found to have published racist content online.
The reforms follow protests against racist police violence across California and the country last summer.
|
|
|
Post by Fugazi on Feb 25, 2021 10:04:02 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by HOOCH2173 on Feb 25, 2021 10:07:25 GMT -8
I guess it was a real Hot Potato issue ehh.
|
|
|
Post by Fugazi on Feb 25, 2021 10:10:42 GMT -8
I guess it was a real Hot Potato issue ehh.
|
|
|
Post by cjelli on Feb 25, 2021 10:20:08 GMT -8
Bloomberg? I smell anti-semitism.
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 25, 2021 10:44:05 GMT -8
I guess it was a real Hot Potato issue ehh. What if Mrs. Butterworth identifies as male? We dont know if his/her wife/husband is male/female.
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 26, 2021 10:25:37 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 26, 2021 10:51:35 GMT -8
Truth teller:
The woman who became the Army’s first female infantry officer is now speaking out against lowering fitness standards for females in a test that evaluates troops’ combat readiness, arguing that doing so would "not only undermine their credibility, but also place those women, their teammates and the mission at risk."
The comments from Capt. Kristen Griest, an Army Ranger School graduate, come following reports this month that the U.S. Army is considering revamping the way it scores its new Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) to account for the biological differences between men and women.
Doing so would stray away from the Army’s original plan for the six-event test to be entirely gender neutral, Military.com reported. "While it may be difficult for a 120-pound woman to lift or drag 250 pounds, the Army cannot artificially absolve women of that responsibility; it may still exist on the battlefield," Griest wrote in an essay published Thursday by the Modern War Institute at West Point. "The entire purpose of creating a gender-neutral test was to acknowledge the reality that each job has objective physical standards to which all soldiers should be held, regardless of gender.
"The intent was not to ensure that women and men will have an equal likelihood of meeting those standards. Rather, it is incumbent upon women who volunteer for the combat arms profession to ensure they are fully capable and qualified for it," she continued. "To not require women to meet equal standards in combat arms will not only undermine their credibility, but also place those women, their teammates, and the mission at risk."
Griest also wrote that "under a gender-based system, women in combat arms have to fight every day to dispel the notion that their presence inherently weakens these previously all-male units."
"Lower female standards also reinforce the belief that women cannot perform the same job as men, therefore making it difficult for women to earn the trust and confidence of their teammates," she added.
|
|
|
Post by carolinasharksfan on Feb 26, 2021 11:08:56 GMT -8
Truth teller: The woman who became the Army’s first female infantry officer is now speaking out against lowering fitness standards for females in a test that evaluates troops’ combat readiness, arguing that doing so would "not only undermine their credibility, but also place those women, their teammates and the mission at risk." The comments from Capt. Kristen Griest, an Army Ranger School graduate, come following reports this month that the U.S. Army is considering revamping the way it scores its new Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) to account for the biological differences between men and women. Doing so would stray away from the Army’s original plan for the six-event test to be entirely gender neutral, Military.com reported. "While it may be difficult for a 120-pound woman to lift or drag 250 pounds, the Army cannot artificially absolve women of that responsibility; it may still exist on the battlefield," Griest wrote in an essay published Thursday by the Modern War Institute at West Point. "The entire purpose of creating a gender-neutral test was to acknowledge the reality that each job has objective physical standards to which all soldiers should be held, regardless of gender. "The intent was not to ensure that women and men will have an equal likelihood of meeting those standards. Rather, it is incumbent upon women who volunteer for the combat arms profession to ensure they are fully capable and qualified for it," she continued. "To not require women to meet equal standards in combat arms will not only undermine their credibility, but also place those women, their teammates, and the mission at risk." Griest also wrote that "under a gender-based system, women in combat arms have to fight every day to dispel the notion that their presence inherently weakens these previously all-male units." "Lower female standards also reinforce the belief that women cannot perform the same job as men, therefore making it difficult for women to earn the trust and confidence of their teammates," she added. Reminds me of a story my oldest told me. When he was competing for his USMC scholarship he was required to do a certain amount of pull ups (I think it was 20) but a woman he was competing against only had to hang from the pull up bar for a bit. When he asked why the standards were different, he was told that any more questions like that...forget any chance of a scholarship.
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 26, 2021 11:29:33 GMT -8
Truth teller: The woman who became the Army’s first female infantry officer is now speaking out against lowering fitness standards for females in a test that evaluates troops’ combat readiness, arguing that doing so would "not only undermine their credibility, but also place those women, their teammates and the mission at risk." The comments from Capt. Kristen Griest, an Army Ranger School graduate, come following reports this month that the U.S. Army is considering revamping the way it scores its new Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) to account for the biological differences between men and women. Doing so would stray away from the Army’s original plan for the six-event test to be entirely gender neutral, Military.com reported. "While it may be difficult for a 120-pound woman to lift or drag 250 pounds, the Army cannot artificially absolve women of that responsibility; it may still exist on the battlefield," Griest wrote in an essay published Thursday by the Modern War Institute at West Point. "The entire purpose of creating a gender-neutral test was to acknowledge the reality that each job has objective physical standards to which all soldiers should be held, regardless of gender. "The intent was not to ensure that women and men will have an equal likelihood of meeting those standards. Rather, it is incumbent upon women who volunteer for the combat arms profession to ensure they are fully capable and qualified for it," she continued. "To not require women to meet equal standards in combat arms will not only undermine their credibility, but also place those women, their teammates, and the mission at risk." Griest also wrote that "under a gender-based system, women in combat arms have to fight every day to dispel the notion that their presence inherently weakens these previously all-male units." "Lower female standards also reinforce the belief that women cannot perform the same job as men, therefore making it difficult for women to earn the trust and confidence of their teammates," she added. Reminds me of a story my oldest told me. When he was competing for his USMC scholarship he was required to do a certain amount of pull ups (I think it was 20) but a woman he was competing against only had to hang from the pull up bar for a bit. When he asked why the standards were different, he was told that any more questions like that...forget any chance of a scholarship. Stalin would be proud of what the DNC has done to this country.
|
|
|
Post by cjelli on Feb 26, 2021 12:08:02 GMT -8
Reminds me of a story my oldest told me. When he was competing for his USMC scholarship he was required to do a certain amount of pull ups (I think it was 20) but a woman he was competing against only had to hang from the pull up bar for a bit. When he asked why the standards were different, he was told that any more questions like that...forget any chance of a scholarship. Stalin would be proud of what the DNC has done to this country. He would be green with envy.
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Mar 1, 2021 8:33:32 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Mar 1, 2021 8:46:55 GMT -8
This is gold:
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Mar 1, 2021 10:22:41 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Fugazi on Mar 1, 2021 10:39:21 GMT -8
|
|