|
|
Post by fishstick on Oct 3, 2019 18:14:56 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by sharkhaywood on Oct 3, 2019 18:33:44 GMT -8
Goven what they went through before this makes sense. |
|
|
|
Post by cjelli on Oct 3, 2019 18:38:26 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by jackalope on Oct 3, 2019 18:58:40 GMT -8
EK gets a pass for last night lol. Good for him. With how good he has looked I'm not worried about the D when he jumps back in the lineup. Its the offense I'm really worried about, with Kane back in the lineup I don't fore-see him putting up a hatty against Vegas to force overtime. I know the young guys need time to figure it out, but as shown by the likes of EDM... You can play your way out of the playoffs in the months of Oct-Nov.
|
|
|
|
Post by cjelli on Oct 3, 2019 19:02:27 GMT -8
EK gets a pass for last night lol. Good for him. With how good he has looked I'm not worried about the D when he jumps back in the lineup. Its the offense I'm really worried about, with Kane back in the lineup I don't fore-see him putting up a hatty against Vegas to force overtime. I know the young guys need time to figure it out, but as shown by the likes of EDM... You can play your way out of the playoffs in the months of Oct-Nov. Kane is not back in the lineup on Friday. |
|
|
|
Post by jackalope on Oct 3, 2019 19:11:03 GMT -8
EK gets a pass for last night lol. Good for him. With how good he has looked I'm not worried about the D when he jumps back in the lineup. Its the offense I'm really worried about, with Kane back in the lineup I don't fore-see him putting up a hatty against Vegas to force overtime. I know the young guys need time to figure it out, but as shown by the likes of EDM... You can play your way out of the playoffs in the months of Oct-Nov. Kane is not back in the lineup on Friday. I'am aware it was a 3-game suspension. I was talking about last nights game. The what if game of if he was in the line up last night, that's why I referenced a hatty to even the score. |
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Oct 3, 2019 19:18:14 GMT -8
EK65 with the best possible news. Now we can return to far less important things. No way was he going to miss the birth of this child.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fugazi on Oct 3, 2019 19:44:21 GMT -8
So he wasn't at the Crap Table last night? Nevermind and Congrats Erik
|
|
|
|
Post by redbeard on Oct 4, 2019 10:36:54 GMT -8
Jones made a few fantastic saves in the second, he just didn't make enough of them. Yea, defense was less than stellar in that first game (C'mon Bogey!) but AGAIN, Sharks simply need more from the goal position than the .886 Jones posted last night. I think we should all easily agree on that. Yeah? Which one of the goals he must've stopped?
Nellie wouldn't know defense if it bent him over and shoved a goalie stick up his eager fat ass!
|
|
|
|
Post by Fugazi on Oct 4, 2019 10:50:58 GMT -8
Yeah? Which one of the goals he must've stopped?
Nellie wouldn't know defense if it bent him over and shoved a goalie stick up his eager fat ass!
Has analytics gone to far? I've never seen that kind of stat before |
|
|
|
Post by cjelli on Oct 4, 2019 12:07:32 GMT -8
Nellie wouldn't know defense if it bent him over and shoved a goalie stick up his eager fat ass!
Has analytics gone to far? I've never seen that kind of stat before In my model the numbers are similar: Vegas's shot attempts were worth 5.777 goals, so Jones saved 1.777 extra. |
|
|
|
Post by carolinasharksfan on Oct 4, 2019 12:31:47 GMT -8
Nellie wouldn't know defense if it bent him over and shoved a goalie stick up his eager fat ass!
Has analytics gone to far? I've never seen that kind of stat before The guys in the top 2 spots took the loss... |
|
|
|
Post by carolinasharksfan on Oct 4, 2019 12:34:54 GMT -8
Has analytics gone to far? I've never seen that kind of stat before In my model the numbers are similar: Vegas's shot attempts were worth 5.777 goals, so Jones saved 1.777 extra. The Sharks were outplayed in every aspect of the game. Jones had good, and bad, points in the game. In fact, 4-1 makes it seem closer than it was. |
|
|
|
Post by cjelli on Oct 4, 2019 14:09:01 GMT -8
In my model the numbers are similar: Vegas's shot attempts were worth 5.777 goals, so Jones saved 1.777 extra. The Sharks were outplayed in every aspect of the game. Jones had good, and bad, points in the game. In fact, 4-1 makes it seem closer than it was. Do you imply Jones could've and should've saved any of the four goals? |
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Oct 4, 2019 14:21:28 GMT -8
The Sharks were flat out terrible. Coach Pete has said as much.
|
|
|
|
Post by LordNelson on Oct 4, 2019 15:42:39 GMT -8
Yeah? Which one of the goals he must've stopped?
Nellie wouldn't know defense if it bent him over and shoved a goalie stick up his eager fat ass!
LOL. What a complete Bullshit made up stat. You either stop the puck or you don't. Save % is about the purest stat we have for a goalie. |
|
|
|
Post by cjelli on Oct 4, 2019 16:17:29 GMT -8
Nellie wouldn't know defense if it bent him over and shoved a goalie stick up his eager fat ass!
LOL. What a complete Bullshit made up stat. You either stop the puck or you don't. Save % is about the purest stat we have for a goalie. Message repeats: which of the four goals were expected to be stopped, but weren't? Also, it's worth to take your time and to learn not to put your answers inside the quoted messages.
|
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Oct 4, 2019 16:37:10 GMT -8
SV % can be deceiving. Remember not so long ago a certain goalie playing for the Ducks shit down the sharks in the postseason in round one? He was good but his blue line and team was better. The sharks threw up a very large number of shots but they were from distance and he could see them all. Why not measure odd man rush for vs against as part of goalie evaluation?
|
|
|
|
Post by carolinasharksfan on Oct 4, 2019 18:40:25 GMT -8
The Sharks were outplayed in every aspect of the game. Jones had good, and bad, points in the game. In fact, 4-1 makes it seem closer than it was. Do you imply Jones could've and should've saved any of the four goals? Yes. |
|
|
|
Post by cjelli on Oct 4, 2019 19:03:44 GMT -8
Do you imply Jones could've and should've saved any of the four goals? Yes. Please elaborate.  |
|
|
|
Post by carolinasharksfan on Oct 4, 2019 19:21:23 GMT -8
Please elaborate. He should/could have stopped the first goal...although it wasn't as bad as the softie he gave up to start tonights game. With a weak defense like the Sharks have, he needs to stop those types of goals...because of Burns and the D being so error prone, he’s going to give up goals he has no chance on, like the third and fourth goals. |
|
|
|
Post by cjelli on Oct 4, 2019 20:18:50 GMT -8
Please elaborate. He should/could have stopped the first goal...although it wasn't as bad as the softie he gave up to start tonights game. With a weak defense like the Sharks have, he needs to stop those types of goals...because of Burns and the D being so error prone, he’s going to give up goals he has no chance on, like the third and fourth goals. Yeah, a PP wrister off a turnover by top-10 player in the league from the slot with a crowd in front. Sure.
Not even Hasek or Tretiak can bail this team out.
|
|
