|
Post by danvilleshark on Dec 18, 2019 17:08:50 GMT -8
The so called community UK style, but remember a poster saying "its ok to be white" is the real problem.... www.yahoo.com/news/two-teenagers-charged-over-anti-semitic-attack-on-rabbi-in-north-london-park-122849277.htmlTwo teenagers have been charged with racially aggravated assault after a rabbi was attacked in north London. The senior religious leader, 54, who has not been named, was beaten up by two people who shouted “Kill the Jews”, “Dirty Jew” and “F**k Jews” at him in Amhurst Park, Clapton, on 29 November. The two teenagers, aged 14 and 15, handed themselves in on Tuesday morning at an east London police station after detectives launched an appeal on Monday.
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Dec 18, 2019 17:09:59 GMT -8
An Israeli college student says she was subjected to a “disturbing,” foul-mouthed anti-Semitic tirade and was physically attacked on a New York City subway last week by a passenger who got annoyed after she was asked to move her bags.
“It makes me feel very humiliated and sad that anti-Semitism still exists,” Lihi Aharon, who immigrated to the United States from a village outside of Tel Aviv in 2013, told Fox News.
She added: “It’s disturbing and it’s scary to think that our world is going in that direction. We must stop this.”
The New York City Police Department told Fox News the incident happened on the southbound 2 train near Wall Street in New York City on Thursday night around 11:15.
Aharon said she encountered the woman, who police identified as Zarinah Ali, 38, as she got on the subway on her way home to Brooklyn after an induction ceremony at her school, The Borough of Manhattan Community College.
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Dec 18, 2019 17:15:26 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Dec 18, 2019 17:27:19 GMT -8
When people tell you the ACLU is not a cook ridden hard left organization remember this gem:
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is calling for men's restrooms to include tampons in order to prevent discrimination against "every person who menstruates."
"While free menstrual products are not uniformly provided in women’s restrooms, they are almost never available in men’s restrooms, even for pay," the group said in a statement Tuesday.
"Men’s restrooms are also less likely to have a place to dispose of these products conveniently, privately, and hygienically."
The left-leaning legal group argued that it wasn't a "full or accurate portrayal" to say that women are the only ones who "menstruate, get pregnant, or breast feed [sic]."
|
|
|
Post by Fugazi on Dec 18, 2019 18:16:35 GMT -8
Just like the FBI’s email system...nothing to see here... Comey was behind a lot of shady shit orchestrated by a few rouge people in the FBI. They all should be in jail
|
|
|
Post by Fugazi on Dec 18, 2019 18:19:23 GMT -8
When people tell you the ACLU is not a cook ridden hard left organization remember this gem: The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is calling for men's restrooms to include tampons in order to prevent discrimination against "every person who menstruates." "While free menstrual products are not uniformly provided in women’s restrooms, they are almost never available in men’s restrooms, even for pay," the group said in a statement Tuesday. "Men’s restrooms are also less likely to have a place to dispose of these products conveniently, privately, and hygienically." The left-leaning legal group argued that it wasn't a "full or accurate portrayal" to say that women are the only ones who "menstruate, get pregnant, or breast feed [sic]." The ACLU turned left many years ago and ruined what was a great institution for the common man. Now they're a bunch of crazies
|
|
|
Post by carolinasharksfan on Dec 18, 2019 19:28:33 GMT -8
When people tell you the ACLU is not a cook ridden hard left organization remember this gem: The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is calling for men's restrooms to include tampons in order to prevent discrimination against "every person who menstruates." "While free menstrual products are not uniformly provided in women’s restrooms, they are almost never available in men’s restrooms, even for pay," the group said in a statement Tuesday. "Men’s restrooms are also less likely to have a place to dispose of these products conveniently, privately, and hygienically." The left-leaning legal group argued that it wasn't a "full or accurate portrayal" to say that women are the only ones who "menstruate, get pregnant, or breast feed [sic]." Classic example of the left going crazy...lets get tampons in mens bathrooms but stay silent on the FBI trampling all over citizens rights. In its current form, the ACLU has nothing to do with protecting civil liberties.
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Dec 18, 2019 20:14:44 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by redbeard on Dec 19, 2019 6:34:59 GMT -8
Overheard a moronic conversation this morning while waiting for my train...
"About time they impeached that mother fucker Trump!"
"Yeah! He fired!! Hahahahaha..."
"Yup! He gone!"
"He gotta be out of the White House today, right!"
"Yeah... something like that..."
As I turned to walk away towards the other end of the train, (that level of stupidity could be infectious at worst, maddeningly annoying at best) I said, "Y'all have no idea about what you're talking about."
"Trump got impeached! He done!!"
"Yeah!"
Some other guy says, "He's (me) right! Y'all are ignorant!"
The two morons stated that they had college degrees. That was the last I heard...good fucking grief...this country is so fucking doomed...🙄
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Dec 19, 2019 7:31:06 GMT -8
Only three years for this crime? An American Airlines mechanic accused of sabotaging a navigation system on a Miami flight with 150 passengers aboard pleaded guilty Wednesday to attempting to destroy the aircraft in a plea agreement designed to avoid a maximum sentence up to 20 years in prison. “I do admit the guilt,” Abdul-Majeed Marouf Ahmed Alani, 60, said through an Arabic interpreter in Miami federal court. Alani, a veteran AA employee who had lived in California and commuted to his job at Miami International Airport, now faces up to three years in prison under a joint recommendation by the U.S. Attorney’s Office and his defense lawyer. His sentencing is set for March 4.
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Dec 19, 2019 7:34:02 GMT -8
Overheard a moronic conversation this morning while waiting for my train... "About time they impeached that mother fucker Trump!" "Yeah! He fired!! Hahahahaha..." "Yup! He gone!" "He gotta be out of the White House today, right!" "Yeah... something like that..." As I turned to walk away towards the other end of the train, (that level of stupidity could be infectious at worst, maddeningly annoying at best) I said, "Y'all have no idea about what you're talking about." "Trump got impeached! He done!!" "Yeah!" Some other guy says, "He's (me) right! Y'all are ignorant!" The two morons stated that they had college degrees. That was the last I heard...good fucking grief...this country is so fucking doomed...🙄 I lost a friend who is like this. He would excuse anything as revenge. Submarine Judge is revenge for not approving the final Obama nominee. Impeach Trump for revenge for Clinton Impeachment.
|
|
|
Post by redbeard on Dec 19, 2019 7:43:57 GMT -8
Only three years for this crime? An American Airlines mechanic accused of sabotaging a navigation system on a Miami flight with 150 passengers aboard pleaded guilty Wednesday to attempting to destroy the aircraft in a plea agreement designed to avoid a maximum sentence up to 20 years in prison. “I do admit the guilt,” Abdul-Majeed Marouf Ahmed Alani, 60, said through an Arabic interpreter in Miami federal court. Alani, a veteran AA employee who had lived in California and commuted to his job at Miami International Airport, now faces up to three years in prison under a joint recommendation by the U.S. Attorney’s Office and his defense lawyer. His sentencing is set for March 4. Through his interpreter? Did his boss at AA speak Arabic? Seems like absolutely clear communication and understanding would be vitally important for someone working on FUCKING AIRPLANES! Three years is a joke...give the guy his three years...at GITMO...with his commrades. After that, put his ass on a raft back from whence he came. Deport!!
|
|
|
Post by redbeard on Dec 19, 2019 7:48:41 GMT -8
Overheard a moronic conversation this morning while waiting for my train... "About time they impeached that mother fucker Trump!" "Yeah! He fired!! Hahahahaha..." "Yup! He gone!" "He gotta be out of the White House today, right!" "Yeah... something like that..." As I turned to walk away towards the other end of the train, (that level of stupidity could be infectious at worst, maddeningly annoying at best) I said, "Y'all have no idea about what you're talking about." "Trump got impeached! He done!!" "Yeah!" Some other guy says, "He's (me) right! Y'all are ignorant!" The two morons stated that they had college degrees. That was the last I heard...good fucking grief...this country is so fucking doomed...🙄 I lost a friend who is like this. He would excuse anything as revenge. Submarine Judge is revenge for not approving the final Obama nominee. Impeach Trump for revenge for Clinton Impeachment. Yikes! Well, for all the Libs crying about "dividing the country" they might have just nuked the last bridge. Politics will become even more partisan. I didn't think that would have been possible. It will be now...thanks to the "unifying wannabe" lefties.
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Dec 19, 2019 7:55:50 GMT -8
I lost a friend who is like this. He would excuse anything as revenge. Submarine Judge is revenge for not approving the final Obama nominee. Impeach Trump for revenge for Clinton Impeachment. Yikes! Well, for all the Libs crying about "dividing the country" they might have just nuked the last bridge. Politics will become even more partisan. I didn't think that would have been possible. It will be now...thanks to the "unifying wannabe" lefties. Unified means to them that you agree with them. Look at the DA SF just elected even though the city is going through a spike in property crime and the homeless situation. This is religion to them and they dont care about what happens.
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Dec 19, 2019 8:21:22 GMT -8
The virus of insanity is spreading: Comment section and media are not at all aligned yet again... www.yahoo.com/news/uk-judge-ruled-legal-fire-134557308.htmlIn a landmark ruling a UK judge has said it is legal to fire employees for saying that transgender women are not real women. Tax expert Maya Forstater was sacked from the Centre for Global Development (CGD) in March 2019 for using what they called "offensive and exclusionary" language. She had written social media posts questioning the process of gender transition, with messages like: "men cannot change into women." She sued the CGD for discrimination under the UK's 2010 Equality Act, which bars employers from punishing staff for their beliefs. However, Judge James Tayler said on Wednesday that Forstater's views are not covered by the law, and are "not worthy of respect in a democratic society."
|
|
|
Post by redbeard on Dec 19, 2019 9:52:12 GMT -8
Yikes! Well, for all the Libs crying about "dividing the country" they might have just nuked the last bridge. Politics will become even more partisan. I didn't think that would have been possible. It will be now...thanks to the "unifying wannabe" lefties. Unified means to them that you agree with them. Look at the DA SF just elected even though the city is going through a spike in property crime and the homeless situation. This is religion to them and they dont care about what happens. I'm as independent, politically, as I can possibly be by my choice. The left doesn't appear to like that at all and are doing everything they possibly can to push me off the fence. That's their choice...🤷🏻♂️
|
|
|
Post by redbeard on Dec 19, 2019 9:59:26 GMT -8
The virus of insanity is spreading: Comment section and media are not at all aligned yet again... www.yahoo.com/news/uk-judge-ruled-legal-fire-134557308.htmlIn a landmark ruling a UK judge has said it is legal to fire employees for saying that transgender women are not real women. Tax expert Maya Forstater was sacked from the Centre for Global Development (CGD) in March 2019 for using what they called "offensive and exclusionary" language. She had written social media posts questioning the process of gender transition, with messages like: "men cannot change into women." She sued the CGD for discrimination under the UK's 2010 Equality Act, which bars employers from punishing staff for their beliefs. However, Judge James Tayler said on Wednesday that Forstater's views are not covered by the law, and are "not worthy of respect in a democratic society." Well, they're really not "real" women. They might want to be a woman but the true reality is they're not. Science backs that up. DNA/genetic testing says so... If you're not happy with your God given equipment, you're free to alter said equipment. You're free to behave however you'd like. You're free to dress however you'd like. Until further notice however, as far as I know, you're not free to change your genetics. Not yet anyway... I'm sure the Libs are funding the research to change that.
|
|
|
Post by cjelli on Dec 19, 2019 10:54:08 GMT -8
The virus of insanity is spreading: Comment section and media are not at all aligned yet again... www.yahoo.com/news/uk-judge-ruled-legal-fire-134557308.htmlIn a landmark ruling a UK judge has said it is legal to fire employees for saying that transgender women are not real women. Tax expert Maya Forstater was sacked from the Centre for Global Development (CGD) in March 2019 for using what they called "offensive and exclusionary" language. She had written social media posts questioning the process of gender transition, with messages like: "men cannot change into women." She sued the CGD for discrimination under the UK's 2010 Equality Act, which bars employers from punishing staff for their beliefs. However, Judge James Tayler said on Wednesday that Forstater's views are not covered by the law, and are "not worthy of respect in a democratic society." Well, they're really not "real" women. They might want to be a woman but the true reality is they're not. Science backs that up. DNA/genetic testing says so... If you're not happy with your God given equipment, you're free to alter said equipment. You're free to behave however you'd like. You're free to dress however you'd like. Until further notice however, as far as I know, you're not free to change your genetics. Not yet anyway... I'm sure the Libs are funding the research to change that. All this circus is waiting for the first transgender to grab an Olympic gold medal.
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Dec 19, 2019 11:24:40 GMT -8
Well, they're really not "real" women. They might want to be a woman but the true reality is they're not. Science backs that up. DNA/genetic testing says so... If you're not happy with your God given equipment, you're free to alter said equipment. You're free to behave however you'd like. You're free to dress however you'd like. Until further notice however, as far as I know, you're not free to change your genetics. Not yet anyway... I'm sure the Libs are funding the research to change that. All this circus is waiting for the first transgender to grab an Olympic gold medal. The only way to have true gender equality is to no longer have gender assigned sports. Let everyone compete equally.
|
|
|
Post by redbeard on Dec 19, 2019 12:29:48 GMT -8
All this circus is waiting for the first transgender to grab an Olympic gold medal. The only way to have true gender equality is to no longer have gender assigned sports. Let everyone compete equally. There was a female (specific reasons for that terminology) that played in one of my "men's" hockey leagues. She was maybe 125lbs. and about 5'3". She was one of the dirtiest players I've ever had the displeasure of playing against. Mouthy AF as well. Always talking smack after a cheap slash or, her specialty, a slewfoot. She always counted on her male teammates to protect her. Her cheapshots and her mouth caught up with her one game. I gave her a warning after a slash and a follow-up slewfoot. She challenged me to drop the gloves. I laughed my ass off. That pissed her off and she decided to slewfoot me again but good. She called me a pussy for not fighting her and it was just part of hockey. I told her to keep her head up. She didn't listen. I trucked her ass but good a couple shifts later, stood over the body and said, "Enjoying equality yet? Still wanna fight?" She didn't hear me as she was sleeping. The melee started quickly thereafter. The teammates were all shouting, "She's a girl! You hit a girl!" and shit along those lines. I shouted back, "Nope, I hit a hockey player!" One of the refs said, "Yes you did, that'll be two minutes in the box! Go sit down!" I didn't argue the call. 🤷🏻♂️ The bottom line is you can't have gender neutral competitions, at least in certain sports. A 125lbs. vs. 205lbs in a collision isn't really a fair competition. Lug nut rule is in play...
|
|
|
Post by cjelli on Dec 19, 2019 12:44:08 GMT -8
The only way to have true gender equality is to no longer have gender assigned sports. Let everyone compete equally. There was a female (specific reasons for that terminology) that played in one of my "men's" hockey leagues. She was maybe 125lbs. and about 5'3". She was one of the dirtiest players I've ever had the displeasure of playing against. Mouthy AF as well. Always talking smack after a cheap slash or, her specialty, a slewfoot. She always counted on her male teammates to protect her. Her cheapshots and her mouth caught up with her one game. I gave her a warning after a slash and a follow-up slewfoot. She challenged me to drop the gloves. I laughed my ass off. That pissed her off and she decided to slewfoot me again but good. She called me a pussy for not fighting her and it was just part of hockey. I told her to keep her head up. She didn't listen. I trucked her ass but good a couple shifts later, stood over the body and said, "Enjoying equality yet? Still wanna fight?" She didn't hear me as she was sleeping. The melee started quickly thereafter. The teammates were all shouting, "She's a girl! You hit a girl!" and shit along those lines. I shouted back, "Nope, I hit a hockey player!" One of the refs said, "Yes you did, that'll be two minutes in the box! Go sit down!" I didn't argue the call. 🤷🏻♂️ The bottom line is you can't have gender neutral competitions, at least in certain sports. A 125lbs. vs. 205lbs in a collision isn't really a fair competition. Lug nut rule is in play... They try the gender neutral competitions in chess. Doesn't work particularly well. The only sport, I think, where it works out ok is Olympic equestrian, because it's easier for a horse to carry a woman.
|
|
|
Post by redbeard on Dec 19, 2019 12:55:20 GMT -8
There was a female (specific reasons for that terminology) that played in one of my "men's" hockey leagues. She was maybe 125lbs. and about 5'3". She was one of the dirtiest players I've ever had the displeasure of playing against. Mouthy AF as well. Always talking smack after a cheap slash or, her specialty, a slewfoot. She always counted on her male teammates to protect her. Her cheapshots and her mouth caught up with her one game. I gave her a warning after a slash and a follow-up slewfoot. She challenged me to drop the gloves. I laughed my ass off. That pissed her off and she decided to slewfoot me again but good. She called me a pussy for not fighting her and it was just part of hockey. I told her to keep her head up. She didn't listen. I trucked her ass but good a couple shifts later, stood over the body and said, "Enjoying equality yet? Still wanna fight?" She didn't hear me as she was sleeping. The melee started quickly thereafter. The teammates were all shouting, "She's a girl! You hit a girl!" and shit along those lines. I shouted back, "Nope, I hit a hockey player!" One of the refs said, "Yes you did, that'll be two minutes in the box! Go sit down!" I didn't argue the call. 🤷🏻♂️ The bottom line is you can't have gender neutral competitions, at least in certain sports. A 125lbs. vs. 205lbs in a collision isn't really a fair competition. Lug nut rule is in play... They try the gender neutral competitions in chess. Doesn't work particularly well. The only sport, I think, where it works out ok is Olympic equestrian, because it's easier for a horse to carry a woman.
It doesn't work in chess? I would've thought there would be a much better chance of success there. The most successful jockeys in horse racing have been men. Little men, but men nevertheless...
|
|
|
Post by Fugazi on Dec 19, 2019 12:57:02 GMT -8
The crazies on the left won't like this
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2019 13:12:38 GMT -8
The crazies on the left won't like this Yeah... she’s polling ninth in the field for 2020. She’s got none chance of getting the nomination. Maybe setting herself up as a potential VP selection to bring in more moderates in the general election. TRO
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Dec 19, 2019 13:19:20 GMT -8
The crazies on the left won't like this Yeah... she’s polling ninth in the field for 2020. She’s got none chance of getting the nomination. Maybe setting herself up as a potential VP selection to bring in more moderates in the general election. TRO Putin told her to do this. Signed Hillary
|
|
|
Post by HOOCH2173 on Dec 19, 2019 13:33:19 GMT -8
The crazies on the left won't like this There she goes that Russian Asset!
|
|
|
Post by cjelli on Dec 19, 2019 13:50:46 GMT -8
They try the gender neutral competitions in chess. Doesn't work particularly well. The only sport, I think, where it works out ok is Olympic equestrian, because it's easier for a horse to carry a woman.
It doesn't work in chess? I would've thought there would be a much better chance of success there. The most successful jockeys in horse racing have been men. Little men, but men nevertheless... No, not racing jockeys. Olympic Equestrian, especially dressage.
It doesn't work in chess. Aside from Judith Polgar phenomena (which only makes one wonder which heights could a boy rise to, given the chess education she received), there's barely been one woman in the top 100. The reason was found a few years ago by grandmaster Vladislav Tkachev: "Women don't like to systematically work on chess analysis for hours. There are no known women chess researchers."
(although the great Paul Keres once said that women aren't very good in chess because they cannot keep quiet for five hours)
All seconds and preparation teams of top women players consist of men only with one possible exclusion of two sisters Muzychuk working together.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2019 14:16:43 GMT -8
It doesn't work in chess? I would've thought there would be a much better chance of success there. The most successful jockeys in horse racing have been men. Little men, but men nevertheless... No, not racing jockeys. Olympic Equestrian, especially dressage.
It doesn't work in chess. Aside from Judith Polgar phenomena (which only makes one wonder which heights could a boy rise to, given the chess education she received), there's barely been one woman in the top 100. The reason was found a few years ago by grandmaster Vladislav Tkachev: "Women don't like to systematically work on chess analysis for hours. There are no known women chess researchers."
(although the great Paul Keres once said that women aren't very good in chess because they cannot keep quiet for five hours)
All seconds and preparation teams of top women players consist of men only with one possible exclusion of two sisters Muzychuk working together.
There seems to be no physical reason women would not be as successful as men at things like chess, billiards or bowling. It becomes a question of training and opportunities- not unlike professions in engineering, sciences or programming. There is a reason most coaches for professional women’s soccer and basketball teams are men - women haven’t been involved in the sport as long as their male counterparts and there aren’t nearly as many women’s soccer and basketball teams as there are men’s teams. It stands to reason then that, except for a few instances, top flight professional women’s soccer and basketball teams are almost exclusively coached by men. It’s not because men are inherently better but rather that there are simply more men to choose from when hiring coaches. Even the USWNT, the second most successful national soccer team ever, just hired a man to replace Jill Ellis. TRO
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Dec 19, 2019 14:23:10 GMT -8
No, not racing jockeys. Olympic Equestrian, especially dressage.
It doesn't work in chess. Aside from Judith Polgar phenomena (which only makes one wonder which heights could a boy rise to, given the chess education she received), there's barely been one woman in the top 100. The reason was found a few years ago by grandmaster Vladislav Tkachev: "Women don't like to systematically work on chess analysis for hours. There are no known women chess researchers."
(although the great Paul Keres once said that women aren't very good in chess because they cannot keep quiet for five hours)
All seconds and preparation teams of top women players consist of men only with one possible exclusion of two sisters Muzychuk working together.
There seems to be no physical reason women would not be as successful as men at things like chess, billiards or bowling. It becomes a question of training and opportunities- not unlike professions in engineering, sciences or programming. There is a reason most coaches for professional women’s soccer and basketball teams are men - women haven’t been involved in the sport as long as their male counterparts and there aren’t nearly as many women’s soccer and basketball teams as there are men’s teams. It stands to reason then that, except for a few instances, top flight professional women’s soccer and basketball teams are almost exclusively coached by men. It’s not because men are inherently better but rather that there are simply more men to choose from when hiring coaches. Even the USWNT, the second most successful national soccer team ever, just hired a man to replace Jill Ellis. TRO I would argue that men are inherently better in soccer/basketball due to physical differences. No amount of coaching will change that. It is also much easier for woman to make high school and college teams in these sports as they compete with far fewer people. Every year our local club: www.mustangsoccer.com/Announces scholarships and most years it is only females due to title nine. Most colleges use scholarships for football and set aside the required matching ones for other sports for women. I am a fan of title nine but the fact is for soccer players the woman have a much easier path than the men do as far as making a team and obtaining scholarships.
|
|
|
Post by cjelli on Dec 19, 2019 15:58:31 GMT -8
No, not racing jockeys. Olympic Equestrian, especially dressage.
It doesn't work in chess. Aside from Judith Polgar phenomena (which only makes one wonder which heights could a boy rise to, given the chess education she received), there's barely been one woman in the top 100. The reason was found a few years ago by grandmaster Vladislav Tkachev: "Women don't like to systematically work on chess analysis for hours. There are no known women chess researchers."
(although the great Paul Keres once said that women aren't very good in chess because they cannot keep quiet for five hours)
All seconds and preparation teams of top women players consist of men only with one possible exclusion of two sisters Muzychuk working together.
There seems to be no physical reason women would not be as successful as men at things like chess, billiards or bowling. It becomes a question of training and opportunities- not unlike professions in engineering, sciences or programming. There is a reason most coaches for professional women’s soccer and basketball teams are men - women haven’t been involved in the sport as long as their male counterparts and there aren’t nearly as many women’s soccer and basketball teams as there are men’s teams. It stands to reason then that, except for a few instances, top flight professional women’s soccer and basketball teams are almost exclusively coached by men. It’s not because men are inherently better but rather that there are simply more men to choose from when hiring coaches. Even the USWNT, the second most successful national soccer team ever, just hired a man to replace Jill Ellis. TRO No, it's not a question of training and opportunities, it's a question of genetics and nature. Women in general aren't good top team coaches because you must have a commander trait in you. The evolution of human race wasn't ambiguous which gender got it. That's not as applicable to kids' training because being a better pedagogue is more important there.
Same about chess - the kind of research necessary for it is just not attractive - to the women chess players by their own admitting. As of engineering and programming, think, why the almost exclusively female profession of a programmer completely flipped around once mass-market PCs and hacking at home became available for the boys.
And, of course, besides that, the inevitable difference in the width of the bell curve...
|
|