|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 13, 2020 10:04:08 GMT -8
Two things:
#1 The so called community #2 The female officer is useless in a physical confrontation
|
|
|
Post by carolinasharksfan on Feb 13, 2020 10:07:34 GMT -8
Anyone surprised? Former Memphis City Schools Board President Tomeka Hart revealed Wednesday that she was the foreperson of the jury that convicted former Trump adviser Roger Stone on obstruction charges last year -- and soon afterward, a string of her anti-Trump, left-wing social media posts came to light. Meanwhile, another Stone juror, Seth Cousins, donated to former Democratic presidential candidate Beto O'Rourke and other progressive causes, federal election records reviewed by Fox News show. And, yet another juror's husband reportedly worked at the Justice Department division that played a role in prosecuting Stone. Not sure if Stone is guilty or not, either way this will probably lead to an appeals court granting a new trial.
|
|
|
Post by Fugazi on Feb 13, 2020 10:09:28 GMT -8
Politicians are idiots. Slavery?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2020 12:03:35 GMT -8
Well, 53% of the voting populace voted for Hillary Clinton so the only surprise to me is how incompetent Mr. Stone’s attorneys were during voir dire. But I get it - Mr. Stone should only have been judged by a jury of his peers so that would be Paul Manafort, Michael Cohen, Michael Flynn, Rick Gates, George Papadopoulos and Alex van der Zwaan - you know, his peersTRO Voting one way or another should not be relevant in a jury pool. If you are a strong activist one way or another it is a fair factor for a trial of a political figure. Do you disagree? Kinda like the motive behind a person making an accusation 30 years after the so called fact with zero evidence, witnesses, yet Marching against the man that nominated him. The vast majority of Americans have never marched for anything political nor have they donated for any candidate or cause. We should be able to find people to fill a jury in a political trial that are not hard partisans. Oh, I agree which is why I led with Mr. Stone’s attorneys being incompetent during voir dire. Either that or the judge during instructions forbid attorneys from asking their political leanings. It seems Fox News has now decided they need to further blindly support Mr. Trump’s twitter account and find anything which would cast doubt on this trial. It comes off, to me, as relevant yet desperate. There were 9 other jurors on that trial who also voted to convict - where’s the deep dive into their backgrounds by Fox News? I’m sure many, yourself included, around here are well aware that attorneys have a penchant for trying to get jurors to disbelieve witnesses by attacking the person rather than what that person is saying. A defense attorney I previously met said “if you have the facts on your side, pound the facts. If you have the law on your side, pound the law. If you have neither the facts nor the law on your side, pound the table.” Fox News is pounding the table. TRO
|
|
|
Post by carolinasharksfan on Feb 13, 2020 12:54:44 GMT -8
Voting one way or another should not be relevant in a jury pool. If you are a strong activist one way or another it is a fair factor for a trial of a political figure. Do you disagree? Kinda like the motive behind a person making an accusation 30 years after the so called fact with zero evidence, witnesses, yet Marching against the man that nominated him. The vast majority of Americans have never marched for anything political nor have they donated for any candidate or cause. We should be able to find people to fill a jury in a political trial that are not hard partisans. Oh, I agree which is why I led with Mr. Stone’s attorneys being incompetent during voir dire. Either that or the judge during instructions forbid attorneys from asking their political leanings. It seems Fox News has now decided they need to further blindly support Mr. Trump’s twitter account and find anything which would cast doubt on this trial. It comes off, to me, as relevant yet desperate. There were 9 other jurors on that trial who also voted to convict - where’s the deep dive into their backgrounds by Fox News? I’m sure many, yourself included, around here are well aware that attorneys have a penchant for trying to get jurors to disbelieve witnesses by attacking the person rather than what that person is saying. A defense attorney I previously met said “if you have the facts on your side, pound the facts. If you have the law on your side, pound the law. If you have neither the facts nor the law on your side, pound the table.” Fox News is pounding the table. TRO I don’t know if Stone is guilty or not. If he is, he should suffer the consequences. However, I don’t think nine years in Federal prison for lying is appropriate when drug dealers are being released on a daily basis. I do know that not many can hear Fox’s table pounding over the din of pile driving the other 95% of the media engage in. I’m not a big fan of Fox (I’m a WSJ guy) but anything Fox is doing on the right is dwarfed by the remainder of the media. Its basically Bambi vs Godzilla.
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 13, 2020 13:02:47 GMT -8
Politicians are idiots. Slavery? Did Bill Clinton not pass welfare reform that encouraged people to work?
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 13, 2020 13:06:14 GMT -8
Voting one way or another should not be relevant in a jury pool. If you are a strong activist one way or another it is a fair factor for a trial of a political figure. Do you disagree? Kinda like the motive behind a person making an accusation 30 years after the so called fact with zero evidence, witnesses, yet Marching against the man that nominated him. The vast majority of Americans have never marched for anything political nor have they donated for any candidate or cause. We should be able to find people to fill a jury in a political trial that are not hard partisans. Oh, I agree which is why I led with Mr. Stone’s attorneys being incompetent during voir dire. Either that or the judge during instructions forbid attorneys from asking their political leanings. It seems Fox News has now decided they need to further blindly support Mr. Trump’s twitter account and find anything which would cast doubt on this trial. It comes off, to me, as relevant yet desperate. There were 9 other jurors on that trial who also voted to convict - where’s the deep dive into their backgrounds by Fox News? I’m sure many, yourself included, around here are well aware that attorneys have a penchant for trying to get jurors to disbelieve witnesses by attacking the person rather than what that person is saying. A defense attorney I previously met said “if you have the facts on your side, pound the facts. If you have the law on your side, pound the law. If you have neither the facts nor the law on your side, pound the table.” Fox News is pounding the table. TRO Foxnews is blind hard right. I am sure we can agree on that. There are some exceptions like Chris Wallace and few others. All I am saying is we should all want a jury pool for any politically charged trial to be free of hard partisans left and right. If his defense team missed this same on them. I dont see any evidence that he was not guilty of what he was convicted for but a tainted jury never looks good.
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 13, 2020 13:07:10 GMT -8
Oh, I agree which is why I led with Mr. Stone’s attorneys being incompetent during voir dire. Either that or the judge during instructions forbid attorneys from asking their political leanings. It seems Fox News has now decided they need to further blindly support Mr. Trump’s twitter account and find anything which would cast doubt on this trial. It comes off, to me, as relevant yet desperate. There were 9 other jurors on that trial who also voted to convict - where’s the deep dive into their backgrounds by Fox News? I’m sure many, yourself included, around here are well aware that attorneys have a penchant for trying to get jurors to disbelieve witnesses by attacking the person rather than what that person is saying. A defense attorney I previously met said “if you have the facts on your side, pound the facts. If you have the law on your side, pound the law. If you have neither the facts nor the law on your side, pound the table.” Fox News is pounding the table. TRO I don’t know if Stone is guilty or not. If he is, he should suffer the consequences. However, I don’t think nine years in Federal prison for lying is appropriate when drug dealers are being released on a daily basis. I do know that not many can hear Fox’s table pounding over the din of pile driving the other 95% of the media engage in. I’m not a big fan of Fox (I’m a WSJ guy) but anything Fox is doing on the right is dwarfed by the remainder of the media. Its basically Bambi vs Godzilla. I agree with this 100%
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 13, 2020 13:08:12 GMT -8
F U Iran!
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 13, 2020 13:22:40 GMT -8
Maybe we can all agree with AG Barr today:
In an exclusive interview, Attorney General Bill Barr told ABC News on Thursday that President Donald Trump "has never asked me to do anything in a criminal case” but should stop tweeting about the Justice Department because his tweets “make it impossible for me to do my job.”
Barr’s comments are a rare break with a president who the attorney general has aligned himself with and fiercely defended. But it also puts Barr in line with many of Trump’s supporters on Capitol Hill who say they support the president but wish he’d cut back on his tweets.
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 13, 2020 13:28:31 GMT -8
The left has unleashed this madness: Three female high school athletes in Connecticut, along with their families, filed a federal lawsuit Wednesday to prevent transgender athletes from competing in girls track and field meets, arguing that biologically male athletes have a physical advantage. Selina Soule, a senior at Glastonbury High School; Chelsea Mitchell, a senior at Canton High School; and Alanna Smith, a sophomore at Danbury High School, announced the lawsuit in a press conference on the steps of the state capitol in Hartford, the Washington Post reported. “Our dream is not to come in second or third place, but to win, fair and square,” Mitchell said. “All we’re asking for is a fair chance.” The three are arguing that competing against biologically male athletes has denied them the chance to win medals and achieve scholarship opportunities. Alliance Defending Freedom, an American conservative Christian nonprofit, is representing the girls in the federal lawsuit, months after initially filing a related Title IX complaint with the U.S. Department of Education. It remains under investigation by the DOE's Office for Civil Rights. “Girls deserve to compete on a level playing field. Forcing them to compete against boys isn’t fair, shatters their dreams, and destroys their athletic opportunities,” Alliance Defending Freedom attorney Christiana Holcomb said in a statement. “Having separate boys’ and girls’ sports has always been based on biological differences, not what people believe about their gender, because those differences matter for fair competition. And forcing girls to be spectators in their own sports is completely at odds with Title IX, a federal law designed to create equal opportunities for women in education and athletics.” The most recent lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court in Connecticut Wednesday argues that a new policy under the Connecticut Association of Schools and Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference, which allows high school athletes in competitions that align with their gender identify, poses a concrete threat to Title IX’s protections against sex-based discrimination. “Inescapable biological facts of the human species [are] not stereotypes, ‘social constructs,’ or relics of past discrimination,” it says. “In track-and-field events that do not use equipment, the physiological differences between males and females after puberty are stark in the record books,” the complaint adds. “No one doubts that top male and female high school athletes are equally committed to excelling in their sport, and train equally hard. Yet boys and men consistently run faster and jump higher and farther than girls and women.” All three plaintiffs have competed with, and almost always placed behind, two transgender sprinters, Terry Miller and Andraya Yearwood. Mitchell finished third in the 2019 state championship in the girls 55-meter indoor track competition behind Miller and Yearwood. The two Connecticut high school seniors, who were born biologically male but identify as female, have won 15 girls state indoor or outdoor championship races combined since 2017, the lawsuit said. Yearwood, a senior at Cromwell High School, and Miller, a senior at Bloomfield High School, issued statements vehemently defending their right to run in girls events in response to the filing Thursday. “I have faced discrimination in every aspect of my life and I no longer want to remain silent,” Miller said. “I am a girl and I am a runner. I participate in athletics just like my peers to excel, find community, and meaning in my life. It is both unfair and painful that my victories have to be attacked and my hard work ignored.” Yearwood said she also has been hurt by the efforts to “tear down my successes.” “I will never stop being me!” she said in her statement. “I will never stop running! I hope that the next generation of trans youth doesn’t have to fight the fights that I have. I hope they can be celebrated when they succeed not demonized. For the next generation, I run for you!” The American Civil Liberties Union sought to intervene on Miller and Yearwood’s behalf, writing on Twitter that “this lawsuit is clearly about trans students, yet those students have no voice in the lawsuit. This is wrong. We at the ACLU will be seeking to intervene in this lawsuit as a new party, to give trans students a voice.”
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 13, 2020 13:35:23 GMT -8
Not so funny now is he #metoo...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2020 14:23:31 GMT -8
Maybe we can all agree with AG Barr today: In an exclusive interview, Attorney General Bill Barr told ABC News on Thursday that President Donald Trump "has never asked me to do anything in a criminal case” but should stop tweeting about the Justice Department because his tweets “make it impossible for me to do my job.” Barr’s comments are a rare break with a president who the attorney general has aligned himself with and fiercely defended. But it also puts Barr in line with many of Trump’s supporters on Capitol Hill who say they support the president but wish he’d cut back on his tweets. So, over/under 14.5 days from AG Barr getting fired? He talked to a not-Fox News media outlet and reprimanded Mr. Trump in public. TRO
|
|
|
Post by Fugazi on Feb 13, 2020 15:28:32 GMT -8
The left has unleashed this madness: Three female high school athletes in Connecticut, along with their families, filed a federal lawsuit Wednesday to prevent transgender athletes from competing in girls track and field meets, arguing that biologically male athletes have a physical advantage. Selina Soule, a senior at Glastonbury High School; Chelsea Mitchell, a senior at Canton High School; and Alanna Smith, a sophomore at Danbury High School, announced the lawsuit in a press conference on the steps of the state capitol in Hartford, the Washington Post reported. “Our dream is not to come in second or third place, but to win, fair and square,” Mitchell said. “All we’re asking for is a fair chance.” The three are arguing that competing against biologically male athletes has denied them the chance to win medals and achieve scholarship opportunities. Alliance Defending Freedom, an American conservative Christian nonprofit, is representing the girls in the federal lawsuit, months after initially filing a related Title IX complaint with the U.S. Department of Education. It remains under investigation by the DOE's Office for Civil Rights. “Girls deserve to compete on a level playing field. Forcing them to compete against boys isn’t fair, shatters their dreams, and destroys their athletic opportunities,” Alliance Defending Freedom attorney Christiana Holcomb said in a statement. “Having separate boys’ and girls’ sports has always been based on biological differences, not what people believe about their gender, because those differences matter for fair competition. And forcing girls to be spectators in their own sports is completely at odds with Title IX, a federal law designed to create equal opportunities for women in education and athletics.” The most recent lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court in Connecticut Wednesday argues that a new policy under the Connecticut Association of Schools and Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference, which allows high school athletes in competitions that align with their gender identify, poses a concrete threat to Title IX’s protections against sex-based discrimination. “Inescapable biological facts of the human species [are] not stereotypes, ‘social constructs,’ or relics of past discrimination,” it says. “In track-and-field events that do not use equipment, the physiological differences between males and females after puberty are stark in the record books,” the complaint adds. “No one doubts that top male and female high school athletes are equally committed to excelling in their sport, and train equally hard. Yet boys and men consistently run faster and jump higher and farther than girls and women.” All three plaintiffs have competed with, and almost always placed behind, two transgender sprinters, Terry Miller and Andraya Yearwood. Mitchell finished third in the 2019 state championship in the girls 55-meter indoor track competition behind Miller and Yearwood. The two Connecticut high school seniors, who were born biologically male but identify as female, have won 15 girls state indoor or outdoor championship races combined since 2017, the lawsuit said. Yearwood, a senior at Cromwell High School, and Miller, a senior at Bloomfield High School, issued statements vehemently defending their right to run in girls events in response to the filing Thursday. “I have faced discrimination in every aspect of my life and I no longer want to remain silent,” Miller said. “I am a girl and I am a runner. I participate in athletics just like my peers to excel, find community, and meaning in my life. It is both unfair and painful that my victories have to be attacked and my hard work ignored.” Yearwood said she also has been hurt by the efforts to “tear down my successes.” “I will never stop being me!” she said in her statement. “I will never stop running! I hope that the next generation of trans youth doesn’t have to fight the fights that I have. I hope they can be celebrated when they succeed not demonized. For the next generation, I run for you!” The American Civil Liberties Union sought to intervene on Miller and Yearwood’s behalf, writing on Twitter that “this lawsuit is clearly about trans students, yet those students have no voice in the lawsuit. This is wrong. We at the ACLU will be seeking to intervene in this lawsuit as a new party, to give trans students a voice.”
|
|
|
Post by carolinasharksfan on Feb 13, 2020 16:41:54 GMT -8
Maybe we can all agree with AG Barr today: In an exclusive interview, Attorney General Bill Barr told ABC News on Thursday that President Donald Trump "has never asked me to do anything in a criminal case” but should stop tweeting about the Justice Department because his tweets “make it impossible for me to do my job.” Barr’s comments are a rare break with a president who the attorney general has aligned himself with and fiercely defended. But it also puts Barr in line with many of Trump’s supporters on Capitol Hill who say they support the president but wish he’d cut back on his tweets. So, over/under 14.5 days from AG Barr getting fired? He talked to a not-Fox News media outlet and reprimanded Mr. Trump in public. TRO I hope you’re wrong but fear you’re right. Barr is 100% correct.
|
|
|
Post by carolinasharksfan on Feb 13, 2020 16:43:38 GMT -8
The left has unleashed this madness: Three female high school athletes in Connecticut, along with their families, filed a federal lawsuit Wednesday to prevent transgender athletes from competing in girls track and field meets, arguing that biologically male athletes have a physical advantage. Selina Soule, a senior at Glastonbury High School; Chelsea Mitchell, a senior at Canton High School; and Alanna Smith, a sophomore at Danbury High School, announced the lawsuit in a press conference on the steps of the state capitol in Hartford, the Washington Post reported. “Our dream is not to come in second or third place, but to win, fair and square,” Mitchell said. “All we’re asking for is a fair chance.” The three are arguing that competing against biologically male athletes has denied them the chance to win medals and achieve scholarship opportunities. Alliance Defending Freedom, an American conservative Christian nonprofit, is representing the girls in the federal lawsuit, months after initially filing a related Title IX complaint with the U.S. Department of Education. It remains under investigation by the DOE's Office for Civil Rights. “Girls deserve to compete on a level playing field. Forcing them to compete against boys isn’t fair, shatters their dreams, and destroys their athletic opportunities,” Alliance Defending Freedom attorney Christiana Holcomb said in a statement. “Having separate boys’ and girls’ sports has always been based on biological differences, not what people believe about their gender, because those differences matter for fair competition. And forcing girls to be spectators in their own sports is completely at odds with Title IX, a federal law designed to create equal opportunities for women in education and athletics.” The most recent lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court in Connecticut Wednesday argues that a new policy under the Connecticut Association of Schools and Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference, which allows high school athletes in competitions that align with their gender identify, poses a concrete threat to Title IX’s protections against sex-based discrimination. “Inescapable biological facts of the human species [are] not stereotypes, ‘social constructs,’ or relics of past discrimination,” it says. “In track-and-field events that do not use equipment, the physiological differences between males and females after puberty are stark in the record books,” the complaint adds. “No one doubts that top male and female high school athletes are equally committed to excelling in their sport, and train equally hard. Yet boys and men consistently run faster and jump higher and farther than girls and women.” All three plaintiffs have competed with, and almost always placed behind, two transgender sprinters, Terry Miller and Andraya Yearwood. Mitchell finished third in the 2019 state championship in the girls 55-meter indoor track competition behind Miller and Yearwood. The two Connecticut high school seniors, who were born biologically male but identify as female, have won 15 girls state indoor or outdoor championship races combined since 2017, the lawsuit said. Yearwood, a senior at Cromwell High School, and Miller, a senior at Bloomfield High School, issued statements vehemently defending their right to run in girls events in response to the filing Thursday. “I have faced discrimination in every aspect of my life and I no longer want to remain silent,” Miller said. “I am a girl and I am a runner. I participate in athletics just like my peers to excel, find community, and meaning in my life. It is both unfair and painful that my victories have to be attacked and my hard work ignored.” Yearwood said she also has been hurt by the efforts to “tear down my successes.” “I will never stop being me!” she said in her statement. “I will never stop running! I hope that the next generation of trans youth doesn’t have to fight the fights that I have. I hope they can be celebrated when they succeed not demonized. For the next generation, I run for you!” The American Civil Liberties Union sought to intervene on Miller and Yearwood’s behalf, writing on Twitter that “this lawsuit is clearly about trans students, yet those students have no voice in the lawsuit. This is wrong. We at the ACLU will be seeking to intervene in this lawsuit as a new party, to give trans students a voice.” You go girls...I’m talking about the actual girls, not the boys pretending to be girls.
|
|
|
Post by carolinasharksfan on Feb 13, 2020 16:47:46 GMT -8
Politicians are idiots. Slavery? Did Bill Clinton not pass welfare reform that encouraged people to work? He did. IMO, it was his greatest accomplishment as POTUS. Think of this...Bill Clinton would be run out of the DNC this election cycle for being too conservative.
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 13, 2020 16:50:14 GMT -8
Maybe we can all agree with AG Barr today: In an exclusive interview, Attorney General Bill Barr told ABC News on Thursday that President Donald Trump "has never asked me to do anything in a criminal case” but should stop tweeting about the Justice Department because his tweets “make it impossible for me to do my job.” Barr’s comments are a rare break with a president who the attorney general has aligned himself with and fiercely defended. But it also puts Barr in line with many of Trump’s supporters on Capitol Hill who say they support the president but wish he’d cut back on his tweets. So, over/under 14.5 days from AG Barr getting fired? He talked to a not-Fox News media outlet and reprimanded Mr. Trump in public. TRO This is where Trump just looks like a child
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2020 17:56:05 GMT -8
So, over/under 14.5 days from AG Barr getting fired? He talked to a not-Fox News media outlet and reprimanded Mr. Trump in public. TRO I hope you’re wrong but fear you’re right. Barr is 100% correct. I hope I’m wrong too but the track record doesn’t look good TRO
|
|
|
Post by carolinasharksfan on Feb 13, 2020 19:29:49 GMT -8
So, over/under 14.5 days from AG Barr getting fired? He talked to a not-Fox News media outlet and reprimanded Mr. Trump in public. TRO This is where Trump just looks like a child If he loses in November, it will be due to his inability to control his caustic behavior. The economy is great, the dems have gone completely insane or turned into socialists, etc. It should be a slam dunk but Trumps mouth will keep it close.
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 14, 2020 9:17:16 GMT -8
The madness of the left: The San Francisco district attorney is proposing creating a $1.5 million fund to help car break-in victims pay for smashed windows in their vehicles. If the proposal passes, the fund could be the first of its kind in the US. The city is in the midst of a car break-in epidemic, with 25,667 reports made in 2019. www.yahoo.com/news/san-francisco-car-break-ins-182358984.htmlSan Francisco's district attorney is proposing creating an auto-burglary-assistance fund that would reimburse residents for the cost required to repair shattered windows from break-ins. The DA, Chesa Boudin, is proposing using $1.5 million from the mayor's office to fill the fund. If it passes, it could be the country's first fund of this kind. "Auto burglaries are the No. 1 way people in San Francisco are directly impacted by crime," Boudin said in the San Francisco Chronicle. "While we know there's more work to do, this is something we can do today to step up and support victims." The city has been experiencing an epidemic of car break-ins in recent years. In 2019, 25,677 people reported car break-ins, according to data from the San Francisco Police Department. The police department only makes arrests in about 1% of cases. Unsuspecting tourists often are victims of such crimes, leaving valuables inside cars and parking on the street, as the Chronicle notes. But the DA's office estimated that nearly 9,000 residents were hit with smashed windows in 2019. This new fund would only be a resource for residents, not tourists or rental car companies, as ABC 7 News reports. The Chronicle recently published a Car Break-In Tracker that tracks the number of monthly car break-ins across the city. While walking alongside cars parked on the street, it's common to see handmade signs attached to the inside of the windows pleading with smash-and-grabbers not to break in. Some note the number of times they've been broken into, others disclose that there is nothing valuable in the car worth breaking the window for. Shattered glass strewn across sidewalks and along curbs is also common. If this proposal passes, it could go into effect by June. Read the original article on Business Insider
|
|
|
Post by cjelli on Feb 14, 2020 9:58:36 GMT -8
The madness of the left: The San Francisco district attorney is proposing creating a $1.5 million fund to help car break-in victims pay for smashed windows in their vehicles. If the proposal passes, the fund could be the first of its kind in the US. The city is in the midst of a car break-in epidemic, with 25,667 reports made in 2019. www.yahoo.com/news/san-francisco-car-break-ins-182358984.htmlSan Francisco's district attorney is proposing creating an auto-burglary-assistance fund that would reimburse residents for the cost required to repair shattered windows from break-ins. The DA, Chesa Boudin, is proposing using $1.5 million from the mayor's office to fill the fund. If it passes, it could be the country's first fund of this kind. "Auto burglaries are the No. 1 way people in San Francisco are directly impacted by crime," Boudin said in the San Francisco Chronicle. "While we know there's more work to do, this is something we can do today to step up and support victims." The city has been experiencing an epidemic of car break-ins in recent years. In 2019, 25,677 people reported car break-ins, according to data from the San Francisco Police Department. The police department only makes arrests in about 1% of cases. Unsuspecting tourists often are victims of such crimes, leaving valuables inside cars and parking on the street, as the Chronicle notes. But the DA's office estimated that nearly 9,000 residents were hit with smashed windows in 2019. This new fund would only be a resource for residents, not tourists or rental car companies, as ABC 7 News reports. The Chronicle recently published a Car Break-In Tracker that tracks the number of monthly car break-ins across the city. While walking alongside cars parked on the street, it's common to see handmade signs attached to the inside of the windows pleading with smash-and-grabbers not to break in. Some note the number of times they've been broken into, others disclose that there is nothing valuable in the car worth breaking the window for. Shattered glass strewn across sidewalks and along curbs is also common. If this proposal passes, it could go into effect by June. Read the original article on Business Insider How long until the Tenderloin district residents begin smashing their own windows for the claims?
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 14, 2020 11:43:23 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Fugazi on Feb 14, 2020 12:06:35 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by cjelli on Feb 14, 2020 13:11:20 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 15, 2020 10:09:36 GMT -8
There is something missing from this all too common story. Can you guess?
A 14-year-old male has been arrested and charged in the December murder of Barnard College student Tessa Majors, the New York City Police Department announced Saturday.
Majors, 18, was killed on Dec. 11 in Manhattan’s Morningside Park in an attack that left members of the community shaken.
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 15, 2020 10:11:53 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Fugazi on Feb 15, 2020 10:41:34 GMT -8
Crazy shit in SF
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 15, 2020 11:30:15 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by danvilleshark on Feb 15, 2020 11:35:12 GMT -8
Ha ha ha!
|
|